July 29th, 2013 Cattle Mutilation in Colorado

September 15, 2013 | By | 7 Comments

310

The morning of Tuesday, July 30th 2013, I was contacted again by rancher Miller from Trinidad, Colorado and was informed he found another mutilated animal on his ranch. This time it was a 5 day old Red Angus calf located alone in an adjacent field at least 200 yards away from the rest of the herd. This is the rancher’s seventh mutilation overall and the fourth this year.

The rancher monitors all the new calves on a daily basis until they are a couple of weeks old when he knows they’re healthy enough not to be watched. The morning of the 30th, his count was down by one, so he started looking around the area where the herd was that morning and noticed the mother standing alone outside the herd staring off in the distance. This puzzled the rancher, so he started walking in the direction the mother was looking towards, and eventually found her calf.

The dead calf was laying by itself showing no signs of struggling and no signs of blood on the ground or on the hide. The carcass was facing towards the East and appeared as if it was placed there and with no signs of drag marks or entrails nearby. Not quite sure at this time why most of my animals are facing east when the ranchers find them, but I have a couple of theories I can’t share at this time.

The only unknown damage to the animal was a four-inch hole in the anal area. Once again no blood was seen on the hide or on the ground near the animal. After briefly speaking to rancher Miller over the phone from Colorado Springs, I made the decision to drive to Trinidad that day in hopes this animal would be a good specimen for a lab necropsy. The doctors at Colorado State University Veterinary Lab had told me the best specimen for a lab necropsy would be a carcase less than 24 hours old, this animal seemed to fit that requirement. So off I went leaving work early, driving by my house to pick up my field kits, and start my 2 hour drive to rancher Miller’s house near Trinidad.

I arrived around 3:30pm and the rancher and I drove off to the site where the animal was found. I asked him if it was common for a calf to be separated from its mother at that young age, and the rancher said no. The mother is very protective and will fight off coyotes when her calf is in danger. The most common time a coyote or pack of coyotes will kill a calf is when the mother is actually delivering her calf. As the calf is being born, the coyotes take advantage of the mother’s inability to fight during the birth, and they’ll literally grab the calf as it’s exiting the birth canal. Due to the stress of birthing, the mother is unable to get up fast enough to protect her young. But when the calf is up on all fours, the mother keeps it close to her and near the herd for protection.

One question kept haunting me over and over again. Why was the mother so far from her calf and afraid to approach it? Generally if the mother’s calf is dead due to natural causes, she’ll stay by its side restless while bellowing. This was not the case, the mother was afraid to go near her calf and stayed close to the herd, yet she was compelled to have her eyes focused on the location her calf was laying. This is very strange.

After examining the carcass of the calf and the location it was found, the decision was made to take the long journey to Fort Collins and deliver the calf to the lab. Because this was the rancher’s seventh mutilation, I needed to be sure the animal didn’t die of natural causes. So off I drove with the calf in the back of my truck and started my 4 hour drive to university.

DSC_0117cmp

At 10:30pm, I arrived at Colorado State University lab in Fort Collins. Luckily for me the lab has a 24 hour drop off time to bring in animals. This is one of the reasons I picked this lab, and the other main reason is, it’s also the best veterinary lab in the state of Colorado. That is a biggie! After dropping off the animal to the late night attendant and filling out the proper paper work, I started my 2 hour drive back home to Colorado Springs arriving around 1:30am. What a day.

The next day at 2:30pm July 31st, I got a call from the lab doctor (name on file) and we discussed his findings while I asked other questions.

He saw the tongue was missing and the edge of the unknown cut was jagged. I asked him if he had ever seen this before, and he said no, that it appeared a little odd.

He saw the complete digestive track was missing from the stomach to the intestines including one of the kidneys. It looked as if they were all pulled out through a 10cm hole in the anal area. I asked him if this was common of what scavengers do, and once again he said he’s never seen this before and thought it was odd too!

There was no blood in the heart, but that could have been due to time of death when the heart was contracted.

Part of the lungs were inflated which meant the animal was alive and healthy at one time.

There was a 10cm hole in the anal area, the rectum was gone, and there was no blood around that area.

The pelvis was protruding through the 10cm hole.

Both eyes appeared to have been pecked out by birds. (This is common and was once a misconception of a standard mutilation.)

No predator or scavenger bites were located anywhere on the carcass.

Signs of maggets and larva were noticable. ( Larva eggs hatch within 24 hours so this carcass would have been older than 24 hours and probably closer to 30.

No excess amount of blood was found in the cavity of the carcass. (Generally a calf will have over 1 liter of blood.)

No cause of death determined.

Once thing that bothered me about the death was the noticeable lack of hemorrhaging and the lack of blood in the heart. If there were no noticeable signs of hemorrhaging, would this account for the lack of blood in the heart? If the heart was still pumping when the calf died, there should be signs of hemorrhaging. The calf could have pumped all the blood out of the heart on its last breath, then a scavenger could have come in later, but pull the complete digestive track out? Pull the tongue out? If this was a common trait with scavenger feeding, then the lab doctor wouldn’t have said he’s never seen that before.

Note: The lab doctor’s findings on the official report reflect just the necropsy lab results based on what they observed. It states what they found during the necropsy but not necessarily what’s missing. As professionals they won’t give their opinions officially because as scientists they must stay neutral in their work. Even though the doctor stated he had not seen certain characteristics in this animal compared to other animals in his career, we still have to leave the possibility open to natural scavenger causes for science’s sake.

The area in the field where the carcass was found showed slight signs of a possible anomaly on the terrain. I took soil samples which were sent out for analysis. At the time of this blog, the soil results are not available probably due to a possible back log of work at the lab. We’ve had some major weather issues here in Colorado lately.

The following is the official necropsy results from the university, any differences between the official report and my conversation with the lab doctor are due to added questions I asked after the report was filed. All expenses were paid by me, and I never charge the ranchers for my time in any of my investigations.

GROSS FINDINGS:
A neonatal bull calf was submitted for necropsy examination. The soft horn (slipper) was partially present on the front hooves. The carcass was severely autolyzed with marked subcutaneous and intramuscular emphysema. The eyes were bilaterally absent. The hair coat was extensively covered with maggot eggs and larvae. Maggot eggs and larvae were present in the oral cavity and in and around the rectum. The rostral two thirds of the tongue was absent and the remaining margins were jagged. No hemorrhage was observed at the edge of the remaining tongue. There was an approximately 10 cm in diameter hole around the regions of the rectum with irregular margins and no associated hemorrhage. The pelvis was partially extruded through the defect in the rectum. The skeletal muscle around the right femur was absent and there was no associated hemorrhage. The only abdominal viscera observed were the liver, left kidney, and a portion of the
abomasum. No significant lesions were observed in the thoracic or abdominal viscera.
Prelim: 7/31/13 CF
Full report: 8/1/13
L a b o r a t o r y F i n d i n g s / D i a g n o s i s
Standard Report(m) – 7/22/2010 Page 1

Tags: , , , , , ,

Category: Cattle Mutilations, The Z-Files

About the Author ()

For the past 28 years Chuck has been researching and investigating the UFO/Paranormal phenomenon. Chuck approaches his investigations with an analytical understanding, making sure to address all human known possibilities before venturing into the non-human or paranormal aspects of the sightings. (TV Shows in which Chuck's investigations have been featured on:) *2002, The Roswell Crash, Startling New Evidence: Documentary Sci-Fi Channel *2006, Sci Fi Investigates: Episode 5, The Roswell episode, Sci-Fi Channel *2009, Primetime: Outsiders, with Juju Chang, Alien Abductions, NBC *2010, SyFy Fact or Faked: Episode 6, San Luis Cattle Mutilation, SyFy Channel *2011, Chasing UFO’s, Episode 3, Alien Cowboys, San Luis Cattle Mutilation, Nat Geo *2013, Finding Bigfoot, Bailey Colorado episode, Animal Planet

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Great work, Chuck. A well-written and concise article. Kudos to you for the effort.
    Did any of the cuts appear to have been made with a knife, or, with a laser?
    Not knowing the geographical area, have there been any unidentified lights reported to the county sheriff’s office, or local law enforcement.
    I had to read the article portion where you mention the rancher’s losses to date – that is incredible – both in material and financial losses, and that the activity is continuing to go on.
    Any thoughts about installing some cameras – I know most ranches are very large and it would be hard to cover all of it, but if the rancher was willing, perhaps the cattle could be confined to a smaller portion.
    Going back years to my conversation with Dr. Leo Sprinkle, have you or the rancher considered running some of the cattle through a cattle chute and panning a black light over each cow? There is a theory that some of the mutilated animals are either pre-selected, or marked at some point prior to, during or after the event. These alleged markings show up under a black light. The sooner the better; apparently they will fade with time. I know that Derrel Sims also advocates this black light inspection to people who have claims of abductions.

    Again – great job Chuck !

    Peace. Scott

    (reply to Scott)
    Thanks for the comment..
    – The cuts are precise but sometimes jagged, but no signs of heat due to laser, although cold lasers are a likely consideration.
    – Yes many ranchers have seen strange lights and heard strange noises before they lost their animals.
    – I have installed motion sensing cameras but have not picked up anything, also a motion sensing
    camera has an IR flash which can be easily seen by any advanced technology.
    – The cows in the San Luis Valley are free-range cows, you can’t confine them because they would
    eat all the vegetation in one area very quickly and feeding them hay would be extremely expensive for these ranchers.
    – I know Leo, yea I use ultra-violet lights looking for clues, not only on the cows but the area
    the mute was located and sometimes on the rancher too! So far nothing has showed up, but I still check.
    I did get some tremendous success using an EMF meter on a couple of my investigations, the animals
    were highly charged.

    thanks for the questions and enthusiasm.
    chuck

  2. Chuck – another question for you.
    Do you have any sense of why this particular rancher has had so many animals mutilated?
    I base my question on a mute case from the Benes Cattle Company, near Valparaiso, NE. When I spoke by phone with Mr. Benes, he volunteered that he was surrounded by other farms and they weren’t having cattle mutilated. When I asked him if he had any idea why, he volunteered that he thought it was because of the special genetic breeding that he did that was unique to the livestock-on-the-hoof operations that surrounded him.

    Keep up your good work.

    Peace !

    (reply to Scott)
    nah, no genetic breeding here, these are free range animals. To answer your question about the rancher’s being targeted over and over again, at first a scary thought was the ranchers themselves are the target, and the animals are the aftermath. Now my theory is “It’s not the ranchers themselves, it’s the way they raise their animals. No steroids, no insecticides, no professional grade grain or feed, no additives, just free grazing animals living off the land.” All ages of cows, all sizes, all healthy.

    Cows are not the only mutilation I’ve investigated and researched, there’s been horses, dogs, sheep, goats, and
    coyotes.

    thanks for the questions.
    chuck

  3. gordon says:

    dear chuck
    fascinating work.! hoping someday you’ll bring out a book clearly documenting all these cases of cattle mutilation … it’s clear these aliens are being sloppy, leaving all these traces. I wonder why and wonder what theyre up to. the bovine blood, the tongues, reproductive organs, the left ear, anal coring? heads facing east. it must be something to do with
    human abductions, the hybrid programme.there must be a connection. couldn’t the cows be chipped (or the abductees) in some with a tiny gps device, under the skin, in the hope that they could be monitored and seen where they’ve gone
    maybe thousands of miles into space ! then dumped back. I guess the aliens would find the chip. maybe inside a tooth? just a silly idea but if aliens
    implant human beings maybe it’s time to beat them at their own game. keep up the great work chuck ! wish I could be there to help.gordon, Scotland.

  4. Jim Ceelo says:

    According to Dr. Michael Wolfe, scientist and whistleblower, he claims the reason for cattle mutilation, was ETs with U.S. Government participation in performing research & development on hybridization of aliens/humans. This technology can have many benefits in all areas of health, military, and science.

    Harvesting of animal tissue, through the so-called ‘Cattle Mutilations’, is to produce organelles – specialized parts of a cell that resemble and function like an organ – which can be placed into humans for filtering out pollutants from the air, water, food etc… Present experimentation is being carried out on the hybrids – part Zeta/part human – or ‘In-Betweens’ as Dr Wolf called them.
    These organelles can also be used to alter the body’s hormones and for changing precursors in the brain from being toxic to non-toxic.
    “These cells are minute and a non-invasive procedure.”
    Cattle genetics are very similar to humans.

    Dr. Wolfe died in 2000 from cancer, but this is a plausible theory.

    ETs have very advanced technologies that can make detection difficult. Out of all the thousands of cattle mutilations that have been occurring, there appears to be no traces of evidence of what is causing it which in itself supports this theory. There can be disturbances in the magnetic and electrical fields that are detected from these animals as a result of being exposed to anomalous environments.

    The existence of cults or predators as a cause is a joke – for some cases that may be; only fools would believe this if you look at all the circumstances these real mutilation cases have occurred around all over the world.

    I believe that somehow our government has lost control over the actions of these ETs because they are just doing too much of this. The secret government knows a lot more than what we realize. If you look at all the stuff that is being withheld from the people, now reported through the Freedom of Information Act, this ET explanation is very real.

    • Chuck Zukowski says:

      Yeah Greg Valdez’s released book says the same thing, the problem with this is out of 10,000 cases across the US, there should have been some evidence left behind, humans no matter how well trained will eventually F-up. Also, this theory slaps our Native Americans in the face who claim animals mutilations were occurring before we migrated to North America. Maybe the government has done some copy-cat mutilations or maybe Valdez’s book and Dr. Wolfe’s assessment are more disinformation than information.

  5. ArthurManby says:

    Chuck,
    I’ve been a lurker on your site for years now. Thanks for the great info.

    This investigation in particular interests me. I grew up (part-time) quite close to the Miller’s; our family farm is out by the airport and cattle ranch north of the river. I am not aware of any occurrences at our ranch, but back in the late 70’s, I do remember riding out to a mutilation site near the Cummings Ranch – not sure the exact location. Pretty eerie.

    As a side note: There is an area east and south of Sunflower Valley (river) called Mooney Hills. It may have some interest to you. We used to sit on the haystacks at night and watch these very slow moving balls of light (orbs) traverse the hills. It was rare, but I had witnessed it a handful of times.

    Bob
    Pueblo CO.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: